Analysis of sustainable urban transport and land use - Modelling tools and appraisal frameworks
Overview
Background & policy context:
Sustainable development and climate change is high on the agenda for most cities around the world today. Urban transport is at the heart of these changes. Increasingly, it is recognised that not only is the emission of pollutants and greenhouse gases a problem, but also the detrimental effects of congestion and social exclusion.
In order to address these issues, it will be necessary for cities to make strategic long term decisions regarding the future infrastructure and land use, not only in terms of what will be built, but also on measures that affect how these systems are used.
Objectives:
The project aims to study the effects of a variety of financial incentives in the transport system, such as changes in taxation and deductions for travel expenses.
To assess how well the various measures fulfil the goals needed a structured way to compare them. The method used in this project is based on back casting principle, i. e. situations will be assumed which meet the goals, and looking in a structured way for possible routes to get there.
A newly developed model of the interaction between transport and localization patterns is the basis for the analysis of policy instruments impact on the system. It is developed for the Stockholm region.
Methodology:
The project's first part is a direct and relatively uncomplicated continuation of two previous projects. One is the study of Robert & Jonsson (2006), assessing the potential of various measures. The second project is a model development project, co-funded by Vinnova and the Swedish Road Administration, which aimed to develop a new integrated transport and land use model landscapes.
By combining the framework of the former with the model from the latter project it is obtained a powerful tool to study the long term effects of transport policy measures on society.
The second part deals with the problem of model use in Sweden. The country traditionally has been very urban-oriented, especially focused on Stockholm. By implementing a shift and recalibration of landscapes to a sparsely populated region, it is possible in a direct and consistent way to compare how the instruments are affecting the two different types of region. It is especially interesting because it can be imagined that some types of economic instruments, such as changes in the tax deduction for commuting could have very different consequences in areas that differ in how well the public transport system can replace car trips.
Share this page