Skip to main content
European Commission logo
TRIMIS

Freight Transport FORESIGHT 2050

PROJECTS
Funding
European
European Union
Duration
-
Status
Complete with results
Geo-spatial type
Other
Total project cost
€2 737 916
EU Contribution
€1 999 623
Project website
Project Acronym
FREIGHTVISION
STRIA Roadmaps
Transport mode
Multimodal icon
Transport policies
Societal/Economic issues,
Decarbonisation,
Deployment planning/Financing/Market roll-out
Transport sectors
Freight transport

Overview

Call for proposal
FP7-SST-2007-TREN-1_05June
Link to CORDIS
Background & Policy context

In the coming years and decades the European Union faces the following challenges in the freight sector:

  • the need to ensure and increase economic growth; and
  • the need to deal with an increase of freight transport demand;

while at the same time:

  • reducing environmental emissions (mainly CO2);
  • reducing dependency on fossil energy;
  • reducing accidents; and
  • avoiding congestion and other negative impacts on the environment and population.

Many different stakeholder groups have created their proposals to achieve sustainable freight transport. Most of them address only part of the problem or focus on only one aspect of a solution. Following these advices leads to sub optimisation and less efficient solutions. A holistic approach is needed integrating all aspects of the problem (infrastructure, vehicles, fuels, interoperability etc) and all types of criteria in the solution (research, technologies, policies and pricing).

Objectives

The FREIGHTVISION project aimed to develop a long-term vision and a robust and adaptive action plan both for transport and technology policy for sustainable long-distance freight transport, which are supported as much as possible by the relevant stakeholders.

In order to develop a vision and an action plan the following tasks were performed:

  • analysing transport policy, technology development, and mega trends with regard to long-distance freight transport;
  • integrating them into forecasts;
  • developing scenarios how to reach a desirable future; and
  • defining for this the vision and action plan.
Methodology

A 'Foresight' process was implemented to achieve stakeholders' support for the vision and action plan. For this purpose four FREIGHTVISION Forums allowed the active involvement of representatives from the Advisory Councils, ERANET (Transport and Road), ministries, infrastructure operators, industries and other stakeholders. The aim of the forums was to reach a common understanding about shaping the future and getting a maximum legitimacy for both the scenarios, the vision and action plan developed.

Funding

Parent Programmes
Institution Type
Public institution
Institution Name
The European Commission
Type of funding
Public (EU)
Specific funding programme
FP7-TRANSPORT

Results

The main project result is the FREIGHTVISION Action Plan. This Action Plan provided recommendations in which way a sustainable European long-distance freight transport system could be reached until 2050. These recommendations were based on the discussion and evaluation of the 35 measures presented at the 3rd Forum Meeting.

For each measures, a proposal of concrete actions and milestones have been developed. These individual action plans have been combined into a single FREIGHTVISION Action Plan.

Innovation aspects

The FREIGHTVISION Action Plan is a combination of RTD and Transport Policy Actions. The Action Plan's intention is to provide policy recommendations on how the 2050 vision can be reached. Two different starting points have been taken for developing this Action Plan:

  • the project team applied the traditional approach of defining a list of measures and trying to make the best out of these measures. This approach reflects traditional policy making and is very much oriented towards current political interest groups;
  • in another approach, sometimes referred to as back-casting, the project team analysed which changes are needed to reach the 2050 vision. This approach ignores current stakeholder interests.

When these two approaches are integrated, discrepancies become apparent, as some of the traditional focus points become less important. Two examples for this paradigm shift are the introduction of GigaLiners and Modal Shift to rail. Both of these topics are high on the political agenda, due to strong interest groups. But both of them have very limited impact on reaching the 2050 vision.

Policy implications

At the Forum Meeting the following (35) topics have been discussed, after which accompanying policy actions have been formulated:

  1. Investment in ITS
  2. Investment in road infrastructure
  3. Internalisation of external costs
  4. HGV weights and dimensions
  5. Liberalisation of cabotage
  6. Progressive distance pricing
  7. Different pricing with regards to freight
  8. Harmonised speed limits
  9. Congestion charge (CC)
  10. Enforcement of regulations
  11. Investment in new railway lines
  12. Freight priorisation
  13. Funding for ERTMS
  14. Electrification of rail corridors
  15. Longer trains
  16. Heavier trains
  17. Investment in IWT infrastructure
  18. Develop new technologies in IWT
  19. Investment in maritime port infrastructure
  20. Training for ecodriving
  21. Automated platooning
  22. Standardised loading units
  23. E-Freight
  24. Network optimisation: cargo owner
  25. Network optimisation: logistics service provider
  26. CO2 labels
  27. Intermodal transport
  28. Transport consolidation and cooperation
  29. Transport route planning and control
  30. Taxation of fossil fuels
  31. Hydrogen infrastructure
  32. Improved Batteries
  33. Including CO2 standards in HGV regulations (EURO standards)
  34. BAT vehicle certification for HGV
  35. Clean vehicle technologies

Other results

With respect to road freight transport: Member States are entitled to allow longer and/or heavier vehicles (measuring up to 25.25 meters and/or weighing up to 60 tonnes) to circulate in their country, provided that this does not affect international competition. International transits are not allowed.

A few countries make use of this possibility. Some countries are undertaking tests or are planning to do so. However, various countries (i.e. Germany, Austria and UK) have said 'no' to the longer and/or heavier vehicles (LHV). In their view these vehicles produce a lot of CO2, form a threat to the competitive position of the rail sector and/or have a negative influence on road safety. Furthermore, it is expected that 60 tonnes vehicles will also require investments in the current road infrastructure.

Because the Member States have different views, the EC tends to focus on the impact of three alternatives: longer, heavier, longer and heavier.

Strategy targets

  • An efficient and integrated mobility system: a Single European Transport Area
  • Innovating for the future (technology and behaviour): Promoting more sustainable development

Readiness

With respect to road freight transport: the concept of LHV (longer and/or heavier vehicles) cannot be implemented, due to a variety of views by Member States.

Member States are entitled to allow longer and/or heavier vehicles (measuring up to 25.25 meters and/or weighing up to 60 tonnes) to circulate in their country, provided that this does not affect international competition. International transits are not allowed.

A few countries make use of this possibility, some are undertaking tests or are planning to do so. However, various countries (i.e. Germany, Austria and UK) have said 'no' to the concept of longer and/or heavier vehicles (LHV). In their view these vehicles produce a lot of CO2, form a threat to the competitive position of the rail sector and/or have a negative influence on road safety. Furthermore, it is expected that 60 tonne vehicles will also require investments in the current road infrastructure.

Because the Member States have different views, the EC tends to focus on the impact of three alternatives: longer, heavier, longer and heavier.

Partners

Lead Organisation
Organisation
Austriatech - Gesellschaft D. Bundes F. Technologiepolit. Massnahmen
Address
Donau-City-Stra?e 1, 1220 VIENNA, Austria
Organisation website
Partner Organisations
Organisation
Tsb Innovationsagentur Berlin Gmbh
Address
FASANENSTRASSE 85, 10623 BERLIN, Germany
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Egis France Sa
Address
Avenue Thiers (Immeuble Le Carat), 69006 Lyon, France
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Suomen Ymparistokeskus
Address
Mechelininkatu, 251 Helsinki, Finland
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Vysoka Skola Chemicko-Technologicka V Praze
Address
Konviktska, CZN/A11000 Praha, Czechia
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Tetraplan As
Address
Kronprinsessegade, 1306 Kobenhavn K, Denmark
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Progtrans Ag
Address
Gerbergasse, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Transver Gmbh
Address
Maximilianstrasse, 80538 Munchen, Germany
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Danmarks Tekniske Universitet
Address
Anker Engelunds Vej, DKN/A2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
The Chancellor Masters And Scholars Of The University Of Oxford
Address
University Offices, Wellington Square, OXFORD, OX1 2JD, United Kingdom
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Wirtschaftsuniversitat Wien
Address
Augasse, 1090 Vienna, Austria
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Institute Of Communication And Computer Systems
Address
Patission, 10682 Athens, Greece
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0
Organisation
Mobycon
Address
Tanthofdreef 15, 2601 CW DELFT, Netherlands
Organisation website
EU Contribution
€0

Technologies

Technology Theme
Freight transport technologies
Technology
Freight transport action plan
Development phase
Research/Invention

Contribute! Submit your project

Do you wish to submit a project or a programme? Head over to the Contribute page, login and follow the process!

Submit