Skip to main content
European Commission logo
TRIMIS

Implications of RVAR (Rail Vehicle Access Regulations) Compliance

Project

UG 331D - Implications of RVAR (Rail Vehicle Access Regulations) Compliance


Funding origin:
United Kingdom
United Kingdom
STRIA Roadmaps:
Smart mobility and services (SMO)
Smart mobility and services
Transport mode:
Rail
Rail
Transport sectors:
Passenger transport
Passenger transport
Duration:
Start date: 01/11/2002,
End date: 01/01/2005

Status: Finished
Funding details:

Overview

Background & policy context:

In December 1999, the Disability Rights Task Force published its report "From Exclusion to Inclusion" which included the recommendation that an end date by which all passenger rail vehicles should comply with rail access regulations should be introduced following consultation. Also, that access regulations should be introduced to apply to the refurbishment of existing rolling stock.

The Government accepted the Task Force's recommendations and instigated a review of the issues relating to both the choice of an end date and the refurbishment of existing non-compliant rail vehicles.

Objectives:

The objectives of the review were:

  1. To examine the implications of requiring full compliance with the Rail Vehicle Access Regulations (made under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995) for a range of dates up to 2035; and
  2. To consider the different ways in which access improvements could be made to existing (non-compliant) stock before the date for full compliance.

The review assessed the costs of the various options and the benefits that could arise in terms of increased rail travel by disabled people.

Methodology:

Assessment of the costs of specific improvements to rail vehicles was made, based on earlier research (carried out by Interfleet Technology in 2001) together with detailed consultation with Train Operating Companies, including London Underground, and the Strategic Rail Authority.

The initial report was circulated for comment to the companies involved in the rail industry and to other organisations with an interest in this issue, including the Disability Rights Commission. Following the consultation process the Review was amended to take into account the views expressed by the consultees and a final version was sent out for consultation in 2005.

It was essential to involve the rail industry in the study, both to ensure that the assessments of costs for the various options were as accurate as possible and to determine the feasibility of carrying out the required modifications to rail vehicles within the range of time scales. Equally it was essential to take account of the reasonable expectations of disabled people in terms of their ability to make use of rail services.

Contribute! Submit your project

Do you wish to submit a project or a programme? Head over to the Contribute page, login and follow the process!

Submit