Skip to main content
European Commission logo
TRIMIS

One Non-National European Sky

Project

ONESKY - One Non-National European Sky


Funding origin:
European
European Union
STRIA Roadmaps:
Network and traffic management systems (NTM)
Network and traffic management systems
Transport mode:
Airborne
Airbone
Transport sectors:
Passenger transport
Passenger transport
Freight transport
Freight transport
Duration:
Start date: 01/06/2001,
End date: 01/09/2002

Status: Finished
Funding details:

Overview

Background & policy context:

ONESKY is a preparatory, accompanying and support measure of the European Commission (DG TREN) in the 5th Framework Programme GROWTH, Sub-programme Area: Traffic management systems. Up till 2000, there has been a sharp and steady rise in delays to aircraft. This had major repercussions for users and placed a substantial financial burden on airlines. The delays were caused in particular by the air traffic control system, which appeared to be less and less capable of handling the phenomenal growth in air travel.

 

In 2001, one flight in four was delayed due to air traffic problems. Despite a temporary slowdown following the attacks on 11 September, estimates are that air traffic will grow by 4% a year over the next 15 years. Delays cost airlines between EUR 1.3 and EUR 1.9 billion a year. While there has been a constant increase in air traffic control capacity in Europe since 1990, it is now trailing three years behind the growth in air traffic. The technical improvements made by Eurocontrol, the international organisation for the safety of air navigation, have not been enough to reverse the trend and delays continue, in particular, in the more central areas of the European Union of 15 Member States.

 

Airspace is in fact still basically organised as it was in the 1960s. Each country regulates its airspace without regard to cross-border traffic flows: a flight from Rome to Brussels passes through nine different control centres. The Single European Sky is an ambitious initiative to reform the outdated architecture of European air traffic control. It comes at a time when improved air traffic and aircraft positioning and communication technologies, such as Galileo, offer opportunities for significant improvements in the efficiency and safety of air travel. It responds to the need to conceive developments in air traffic management as a building block of the Community transport policy, enshrined in the White Paper of 27 November 2001.

Objectives:

The objective of the ONESKY project was to develop proposals for a European airspace structure that are able to support an efficient traffic flow based on needs rather than on existing national structures. The proposals were developed regardless of national frontiers and acknowledging the new geopolitical realities when dividing the airspace between military and civil users.

 

ONESKY's proposals should be regarded as examples of what can be gained if sectors can be designed regardless of national boundaries. Two proposals/designs were produced together with two supporting studies:

 

1- A bottom-up, 'current airspace design'

2- A top-down, 'clean sheet design'

 

A- In support of these proposals the military issues related to airspace design were studied

B- Finally a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of both design proposals was performed.

 

ONESKY will demonstrate that their proposals will, if implemented, result in an increase in airspace capacity.

Methodology:

The ONESKY work programme will be conducted using Fast Time simulation techniques within an accepted Validation Methodology.

 

The ONESKY project will follow two lines of action:

 

  • Line 1 will examine, within the current ECAC (European Civil Aviation Conference) airspace, those areas which contribute to the overall delays due to their having an artificial sector boundary imposed through adherence of a national frontier or through the inclusion of military airspace. The improvements to the overall efficiency of the ECAC area will be identified.
  • Line 2 will examine the efficiencies that may be gained across the ECAC area if the airspace could be designed 'from scratch'. While this is most likely an impractical proposition, it will identify the theoretical efficiencies that may be achieved and will produce a design that should act as an eventual aim.

One cannot perform an airspace design, without including the military aspects. Therefore a separate workpackage dealt with studying and implementing relevant military aspects into the above mentioned designs. Next to the military aspects, the two designs were also subjected to a cost-benefit-analysis.

Contribute! Submit your project

Do you wish to submit a project or a programme? Head over to the Contribute page, login and follow the process!

Submit