Access situation of leisure facilities (SVI 2004/079)
Overview
Background & policy context:
High traffic leisure facilities include establishments such as multiplex cinemas, water parks, zoos, theme parks, large museums and combined facilities for shopping and leisure. Just like high traffic shopping centres, large leisure facilities attract a considerable number of visitors and therefore place a strain on local transport networks. Compared to shopping centres, high traffic leisure facilities have a number of specific characteristics:
- Visitor flows vary greatly from day to day and from week to week, as well as from season to season. Many facilities attract extremely high visitor flows within a very short space of time. This poses particular challenges for accessibility and the planning of transport structures.
- A considerable number of visitors travel from a long way away, often using long distance services. For this reason, great importance needs to be attached to the long distance network.
- Depending on the type of services offered, leisure facilities can attract specific visitor types who may have a preference for a particular mode of transport. Target-group oriented approaches are therefore required if the way people travel is to be influenced.
- High traffic leisure facilities can be found in city centres, in suburban areas, and in rural areas. Given this variety, the quality of transport links and the local environment parameters will differ greatly from facility to facility. The planning function for leisure facilities must therefore be designed in a highly context-sensitive way.
Recommendations as to how high traffic facilities should be planned have up until now been based mainly on the analysis of major shopping centres. The unique characteristics of leisure facilities, however, mean that proposed measures should be developed in a targeted way for precisely these high traffic establishments.
Objectives:
Up until now, no such comparative analyses have been available for the different types of leisure facility that exist in Switzerland. The purpose of this study is to undertake this task. It is restricted to leisure facilities that offer services of a permanent nature. It does not consider facilities that offer leisure services for only a certain time or for a particular season (e.g. winter sports establishments). The aim of the investigation is to develop empirically- derived recommendations for the optimization of transport connections and to resolve the problem of high traffic levels in the vicinity of leisure facilities.
Methodology:
The objectives are to be achieved through the following analysis:
- In a comparative study, the status quo of the access situation at 20 leisure facilities of different types is documented, with typical problem situations being identified.
- Analysis of the planning history of three leisure facilities (FCS Park Schaffhausen, Aquabasilea Pratteln, Westside Berne) has been undertaken to identify, on the basis of these actual examples, how the criterion of accessibility was taken into account in the search for (and development of) the location in question.
- Differences in the form of transport selected by visitors and in local area access provision – including for pedestrian and cycle traffic – are investigated with the aid of customer surveys, on-site questionnaires and supplementary expert discussions for four specific leisure facilities: the Kino MaxX multiplex in Emmenbrücke, the Maag site in Zurich, the Swiss Transport Museum in Lucerne and Technorama in Winterthur.
These analyses then feed into comprehensive recommendations that are formulated for the following three areas of action: spatial planning, traffic planning and mobility management. These recommendations are also documented in a separate guideline for planners, facility operators, and a wider specialist audience.
Share this page