Skip to main content
European Commission logo
TRIMIS

Requirements for Roadside Equipment for the Case of Using Hard Shoulders for Moving Traffic (VSS2000/348)

Project

Requirements for Roadside Equipment for the Case of Using Hard Shoulders for Moving Traffic (VSS2000/348)


Funding origin:
Switzerland
Switzerland
STRIA Roadmaps:
Network and traffic management systems (NTM)
Network and traffic management systems
Transport infrastructure (INF)
Transport infrastructure
Transport mode:
Road
Road
Transport sectors:
Passenger transport
Passenger transport
Freight transport
Freight transport
Duration:
Start date: 01/06/2003,
End date: 01/11/2009

Status: Finished
Funding details:

Overview

Background & policy context:

Continuing traffic increases on the national road system lead increasingly to regular overloading during peak hours, especially on motorway sections in agglomeration areas. Therefore, the hard shoulder usage has been considered a possible measure for quite some time by which short term capacity overload and road safety problems associated with it can be decreased. We can distinguish between small-scale, local hard shoulder usage as the extension of entry and exit zones, weaving sections or auxiliary lanes on upgrades (group A applications) and section-wise conversions between two or several grade-separated interchanges or junctions (group B applications). The small-scale applications of group A are usually permanently implemented, i.e. that the road marking of the cross section is there to last for a long period of time and the former hard shoulder is no longer recognisable as such for the road user. These applications can be found on Swiss motorways already today and the experiences made with regard to the defusing of conflict situations have been positive. However, in Switzerland section-wise conversions between two or several grade-separated interchanges or junctions have not yet been realised (group B applications). With these applications the question arises whether the hard shoulder should be converted permanently or only temporarily. Both modes of operation have their advantages and disadvantages regarding traffic flow, road safety, maintenance and operations as well as costs. Additionally they strongly differ from each other regarding the requirements for road side equipment.

In the project "Requirements for the roadside equipment at the rededication of hard shoulder", the foundations for a Swiss standard were be developed.

To assess the application of the reclassification concrete and the ability normalise criteria are formulated. A distinction is made dynamic applications, static applications and cases where no application is possible. The assessment of equipment requirements will be based on traffic engineering, safety and legal criteria depending on the application.

Objectives:

Prepare basis for a draft standard to reflect whether and how the hard shoulder as an additional lane (limited in time) could be used. Demands on transport systems including the lane light signals will be defined including application criteria and constraints.

Methodology:

  • Elaboration of specific and standardised application criteria for dynamic and static use of hard shoulders at motorways as carriageways.
  • Collection of standards of road equipment on behalf of criteria of traffic engineering, saety engineering (in particular to avoid accidents and incident detection) and infrastructure (usability, load capacity, road structure).
  • Analysis of law aspects and formulation of a possible amendment of federal law.

Contribute! Submit your project

Do you wish to submit a project or a programme? Head over to the Contribute page, login and follow the process!

Submit